Photoshopping Ethics
Complaints about the unattainable, unnatural, or unhealthy standards of beauty perpetuated by the fashion industry aren't new. But in Britain, fashion photoshopping in particular is facing new scrutiny. A group of British media associations are considering adopting "'a voluntary code covering the use of digital manipulation [in photography].' Publications could...be asked to declare if an image had been altered."
As Amy Odell points out "If magazines follow this voluntary code, every picture would bear an 'airbrushed' stamp because every picture is digitally enhanced in magazines."
How about the opposite tack? What if unaltered images had the right to carry an "authentic" stamp?
Via PSFK.
Posted on April 8, 2008 by - andrewprice
Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!
not yet rated
Tyra Post
It's never good when your blog post resemble Tyra Banks Show "hot and completely irrelevant" topics.
How about an option for i don't give a damn.
Posted on April 9, 2008 — by acc
0 comments
not yet rated
Title
Perhaps by now, as most people know fashion photographs are manipulated to the point of the model being a mere inspiration for the eventual image, we no longer have to classify this as "unnatural". The next step in this process is a fully computer generated "photograph", which interestingly enough seems not at all subject to the same criticisms that this type of image manipulation receives right now, simply because the "source person" was never born. Also think about make-up effects and image manipulation in movies... Gollum...CG actors in games...etc.
Posted on April 9, 2008 — by superfamous
0 comments