Steal This Idea: Better CFL Packaging
Australia recently passed a law that will ban the sale of incandescent lightbulbs in three years, and other countries are looking to follow suit. Here is an idea to help boost the sales of compact fluorescent lights—the leading alternative technology—and to make sure consumers take the imperative step of recycling their burned-out CFLs.

The idea:
A 25-watt CFL will save 75 percent of the energy costs of a 100-watt incandescent bulb while providing the same amount of light. Seems like a no-brainer, but adoption has been slow. There’s also a downside: Each CFL contains trace amounts of poisonous mercury that must be recycled so that it doesn’t leach into the soil in a landfill. What if clever packaging simplified the process of recycling, while also making the technology seem as sexy as it is smart?
How it might work:
The elegant box design increases the CFL’s desirability and communicates valuable information about cost savings and how the technology works. The inner sleeve protects the bulb from damage; it also documents statistics about CFL use and the earth-friendly packaging. The outer packaging is reversible; printed on the inside is a prepaid shipping label. You put the burned-out CFL you’re replacing in the return packaging for free and safe recycling—all you have to do is drop it in a mailbox.
What it means:
As noted on the packaging, if every U.S. household replaced one incandescent bulb with a CFL, “it would save enough energy to power more than 2.5 million homes and prevent the formation of greenhouse gases equivalent to the emissions of nearly 800,000 cars.” The no-hassle recycling would reduce the amount of dangerous mercury ending up in landfills.
Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!





not yet rated
hallelujah-common sense!
Glass and metal are becoming more expensive commodities. I'd gladly pay a little extra for a CFL to pay for return shipping for recycling.
Posted on August 18, 2007 — by RobotWarz
0 comments
1 vote
Big Box Store Dropoff
I heard Target and Wal-Mart are both considering having dropoff bins for used CFL's - I love 'em (CLFs); they really do save you money!
Posted on August 25, 2007 — by ray210
0 comments
not yet rated
Do they really save money?
I have slowly but surely replaced a huge percentage of my bulbs with these little suckers and I'm going to be honest - my electric bill hasn't decreased.
On the bright side, my house if filled with little glass containers that have mercury in them.
Seriously, I see someone says they save you money. Can you honestly say you've seen a difference in your bill?
I haven't.
Posted on August 26, 2007 — by tsteele93
1 comment
1 vote
They're simply more convenient
While I don't know about cost-saving and eco-friendliness, I'm sure that CFL's are way more convenient. They live much longer and I don't have to replace them that often. In particular, they are much more robust against flaky power lines and being bumped. Every time a incandescent bulb is bumped it burns out --- how annoying is that!
Posted on September 6, 2007 — by DenisG
0 comments
not yet rated
Mercury
While CFLs are a large step forward in efficiency, their greatest environmental downside is that they contain Mercury.
All fluorescent bulbs contain this heavy metal as a vapor and if a bulb breaks it simply mixes with the air around you.
Mercury is a heavy metal which can be absorbed into the body by breathing it. Once there it stays for a long time and causes damage to the nervous system.
This is why I believe LED light bulbs are most likely a better alternative.
Please recycle your CFLs people and be careful not to break them.
That is the reason recycling MUST be implemented with these bulbs. The actual reuse of the components is secondary in importance.
Posted on September 18, 2007 — by vlado4
0 comments
not yet rated
LED's
Why cant we move beyond CF to LED's? I do not know all the sides of LED's but the size, longevity, and mpact on the environment should push the CF argument to the side.
We have a few in our home and the light is superior to the CF bulbs.
Can anyone educate me on why LED is bad?
Posted on September 24, 2007 — by cazayoux
1 comment
not yet rated
Savings?
If people aren't actually seeing a cost savings in their bills as someone mentioned here doesn't that mean that the bulbs aren't actually saving electricity? Although I know nothing about them, LEDs already sound like a better alternative.
Posted on September 26, 2007 — by tim
0 comments
not yet rated
LED Lighting
I think a better solution is to skip the CFL's completely and head straight to the next big thing, LED's. I just purchased some from www.lumenstarled.com, Energy Efficient lighting has come a long way.
Posted on December 6, 2007 — by energyguy
0 comments