Barack Hussein Obama
response to hinesbrad's post Obama Military Experience
Oh yea. You see this is why Americans have become the suckers of the 21st century. 30 years is better than no years at anything. How, sir can you been so gullable? And why wont you mention his middle name when you speak of Barack Hussein Obama? Now, if I had to choose who would do better in the desert, it would be Barack Hussein Obama. Arabs are used to the sand. Muslims have been hiding and fighting in the sand for centuries. Make no mistake about that. He is and always will be Islam. That, my friends is the great con game of the century. And Americans are too stupid to see it. How can you be so fooled? How? Do you really want a Muslim for our president? They are scamming us just like the pilots who lived among us and then flew plans and dissigrated 3000 of our people. Your memory is short my friend. Barack Hussein Obama is just the next piece in the puzzle. 80% of the world's battles are fought between Islam and X. Why do you suppose that is? Dont make judgements unless you read. Its not an accident that these readicals are out breeding everyone. Breed, teach them to hate - what do you have?
So, if you think Barack Hussein Obama would do better in the sand? you're right. And you are falling for the con.
Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!
not yet rated
You have inspired me to true patriotism.
To put it simply, any and all candidates that are pro-mortimer5, are, or could conceivably be, the candidate for me. I'll tell you why.
A democrat would be secretly appalled by the frank honesty and belligerent candor that makes mortimer5 lovable.
A neocon republican would be shamed (and burn like a salt-ridden slug) by the honesty of mortimer5's truth-and-spittle inflections.
Independent parties would never be able to pin you down, mortimer5. Your soul is too free.
I am deeply moved to comment by your outcry. The amount of time and research you've placed into your work is evident(arab + sand connection = FANTASTIC! both four letters!!!). As evident as your subtle mastery of the craft of investigative journalism. To risk understatement, I find it shocking that I have not heard most of these facts before. Ever! (Who is hiding them from me? How far did you have to go "past the line" to get the truth?)
Many presidential candidates would be inclined to address mortimer5's ethics (and spelling; grammar; sentence fragments), or perhaps postulate on the numerous fallacious and generally illegible/improvable statements and statistics that populate mortimer5's arguments. Some would question the veracity of mortimer5's claim that mortimer5 accidentally shredded all of the documents pertaining to the information mortimer5 is using. A few would find mortimer5 an offensive stereotype of loudmouth americans. But not my candidate.
Because my candidate is the candidate that supports America, supports American citizens, supports America for Americans, and supports the first amendment that allows any of her teeming millions to get on a computer and authoratatively talk about something they simply don't fully comprehend. Anything, even!
Finally, insomuch as what the first amendment would say if it were a real person -- mortimer5 and mortimer5's opinion are true, true-true patriots.
ALSO...... here I was mistaken thinking that the con of the century was someone buying the presidency........Good Ship Nepotism, Ahoy!
P.S. Morty Baby -
if you're saying that B.H.O. would "do better in the sand", I totally agree with you! I think turning the oval office into a giant sandbox would probably relax things when presidential shit gets real stressful.
Posted on July 1, 2008 — by admonisher
0 comments