processed food is not healthy

response to  Taylor Clark and Greg Miller's post Where’s the Beef?

This article would have been relavant 10 years ago. Today, people have quickly realized the importance of replacing processed food with a healthy variety of locally grown and seasonally appropriate food.

While I would advocate a move away from the meat-centric diet of an average eater in the US, it's a mistake to think that fake meat is a healthy alternative for people or for the environment. The US diet is clogged with processed food. The manufacturing process adds to pollution and reduces nutritional value.

Our bodies are widely varied and unique. It's naive to believe that we can replicate nature's bounty with soy and a factory posing as a country kitchen. Some people need more protein, others need more dark and leafy greens. Nobody needs a homogeneous diet of soy, soy, and more soy. It's a healthy food in moderation, but like this it's no better than corn syrup. In high quantities, it raises a person's estrogen to unhealthy levels. It's a terrible idea to serve it for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

Almost 100 years ago, we began bleaching our bread to tamper with appearances. This carcinogenic chemical process is banned in Europe and Canada. In the US, we simply mandate that companies label the food and re-inject the chemical equivalent of natural vitamins that get stripped out. We foolishly believing it will be metabolized just the same. As a result of this and other food processing, we're a nation of fat people with rampant cancer. 100 years from now, we will realize that bastardizing soy led the way to other diseases.

Eaters everywhere: chuck the boxes and bags and buy your food fresh. Eat your fruits, veggies, and if your body needs it, meat from local farms free from GMO, antibiotics, and cruel conditions.

Editors: are you there? This article reiterates stale ideas. It's a commercial for an industry at the expense of our health.

Like this article? Tell the world  It's Good!