Slippery slope arguments

response to  Justin Gabbard and Doug Brooks's post Ruthless Humanitarianism

The arguments against Justin's premise all feel kinda slippery slope - presenting risks but without factoring in how great or small these risks are and weighing that against the inevitable result on inaction. Blackwater already exists, pre-meditated war already exists, genocide, dictatorships and mercenaries already exist. Putting a private military to use to support a collective agreement among some quorum of nations is at least worth considering.

whether or not these risks are great or small and what in action will certainly turn out.

Like this article? Tell the world  It's Good!